As Republican opponents staged a filibuster to express their unhappiness over a proposal they could not veto, the Senate was on pace this week to adopt a long-awaited package of military assistance for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan after several delays and much suspense.

By a vote of 66-33, the Senate overcame a 60-vote gap to remove the final procedural obstacle and restrict discussion of the bill to the final 30 hours prior to a potential Wednesday vote on passage.

The approximately $95 billion emergency spending bill was worked on by senators throughout the weekend, and it successfully passed many procedural obstacles on its way to becoming law. After hours of discussion and a verbal filibuster led by Republican senator Rand Paul and supported by a group of the chamber’s supporters of Donald Trump, the chamber voted on the legislation on Monday night.

Senate majority leader and Democrat from New York, Charles Schumer, stated on Monday that the votes over the weekend proved “beyond doubt that there’s strong support” for moving forward with the overseas aid package.

“These are the extraordinarily high stakes of the supplemental package: our democracy, our values, and our security,” stated Schumer. It serves as a down payment on the survival of American ideals and western democracy.

“What the Senate does in the coming days will be remembered by everyone on the planet,” he said. At this moment, nothing would make Putin happier than to witness Congress falter in its backing of Ukraine; nothing would benefit him more militarily.

The bill would next proceed to the Republican-led House, where it is unclear what would happen if it passes the Senate as anticipated. Despite the fact that a bipartisan majority still favors providing aid to Ukraine, a rising number of Republicans are beginning to share Trump’s contempt for the US-backed war effort.

According to a statement from House Speaker Mike Johnson, “House Republicans were crystal clear from the very beginning of discussions that any so-called national security supplemental legislation must recognize that national security begins at our own border.”

Conservatives Have Been Opposing the Ukraine Aid Package

The Republican speaker criticized the package for being “silent on the most pressing issue facing our country” and said it lacked provisions for border security. Conservatives have been opposing the Ukraine aid package for months, demanding that border security policy be included. This week, they rejected a bipartisan proposal aimed at reducing the number of illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border. This is the latest and potentially most consequential sign of their opposition.

“Now, the House will have to continue working its own will on these important matters, in the absence of having received any single border policy change from the Senate,”

As Republican opponents staged a filibuster to express their unhappiness over a proposal they could not veto, the Senate was on pace this week to adopt a long-awaited package of military assistance for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan after several delays and much suspense.

By a vote of 66-33, the Senate overcame a 60-vote gap to remove the final procedural obstacle and restrict discussion of the bill to the final 30 hours prior to a potential Wednesday vote on passage.

The approximately $95 billion emergency spending bill was worked on by senators throughout the weekend, and it successfully passed many procedural obstacles on its way to becoming law. After hours of discussion and a verbal filibuster led by Republican senator Rand Paul and supported by a group of the chamber’s supporters of Donald Trump, the chamber voted on the legislation on Monday night.

Senate majority leader and Democrat from New York, Charles Schumer, stated on Monday that the votes over the weekend proved “beyond doubt that there’s strong support” for moving forward with the overseas aid package.

“These are the extraordinarily high stakes of the supplemental package: our democracy, our values, and our security,” stated Schumer. It serves as a down payment on the survival of American ideals and western democracy.

“What the Senate does in the coming days will be remembered by everyone on the planet,” he said. At this moment, nothing would make Putin happier than to witness Congress falter in its backing of Ukraine; nothing would benefit him more militarily.

The bill would next proceed to the Republican-led House, where it is unclear what would happen if it passes the Senate as anticipated. Despite the fact that a bipartisan majority still favors providing aid to Ukraine, a rising number of Republicans are beginning to share Trump’s contempt for the US-backed war effort.

According to a statement from House Speaker Mike Johnson, “House Republicans were crystal clear from the very beginning of discussions that any so-called national security supplemental legislation must recognize that national security begins at our own border.”

The Republican speaker criticized the package for being “silent on the most pressing issue facing our country” and said it lacked provisions for border security. Conservatives have been opposing the Ukraine aid package for months, demanding that border security policy be included. This week, they rejected a bipartisan proposal aimed at reducing the number of illegal crossings at the US-Mexico border. This is the latest and potentially most consequential sign of their opposition.

“Now, the House will have to continue working its own will on these important matters, in the absence of having received any single border policy change from the Senate,” Johnson stated. “The status quo offered by the Senate is unacceptable to America.”

$60 billion in money is included in the measure for Ukraine, whose army are running out of ammunition as they attempt to drive back Russian forces almost two years after the invasion. A large portion of the money would be used to bolster military operations in Ukraine and restock US supplies of weaponry and equipment that have been deployed to combat zones. $14 billion more would be used to fund US military activities in the area and support Israel. Over $8 billion will be used to assist US allies in the Indo-Pacific area, such as Taiwan, in their endeavor to thwart Chinese aggression.

Additionally, it sets aside around $10 billion for relief efforts in Gaza, Israel, and the Ukraine, where a fifth of the population is malnourished and vast portions of the region have been devastated.

The bipartisan border crackdown that Republicans requested in exchange for their approval of the foreign aid package is not part of the plan. However, Republicans pulled out of the agreement after months of tense discussions because of Trump’s outspoken hostility to the border security proposal.

stated. “The status quo offered by the Senate is unacceptable to America.”

$60 billion in money is included in the measure for Ukraine, whose army are running out of ammunition as they attempt to drive back Russian forces almost two years after the invasion. A large portion of the money would be used to bolster military operations in Ukraine and restock US supplies of weaponry and equipment that have been deployed to combat zones. $14 billion more would be used to fund US military activities in the area and support Israel. Over $8 billion will be used to assist US allies in the Indo-Pacific area, such as Taiwan, in their endeavor to thwart Chinese aggression.

Additionally, it sets aside around $10 billion for relief efforts in Gaza, Israel, and the Ukraine, where a fifth of the population is malnourished and vast portions of the region have been devastated.

The bipartisan border crackdown that Republicans requested in exchange for their approval of the foreign aid package is not part of the plan. However, Republicans pulled out of the agreement after months of tense discussions because of Trump’s outspoken hostility to the border security proposal.

Also Read: Trump attends a Florida Secret Documents Case Hearing Behind Closed Doors